JK Rowling donates £1m to Liebour

! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.

JK Rowling has donated £1m to the Liebour Party, saying that poor and vulnerable people would fare better under Liebour than the Conswervatives.

For fucks sake.

Did she not notice the 10p tax band being abolished? Of course not, the hourly interest on her £560m fortune is far and above the amount a poor and vulnerable person was allowed to earn before having to pay the normal amount of income tax.

Mrs Sane has been instructed not to buy any more Harry Potter tat for the spawn.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

2 comments

  1. Drew, Debs, Chris and Maria (1 comments) says:

    Harry Potter always reminds us of Adrian Mole – the grotty 1980s school kid anyway. We could never get into the Potter hype – kept expecting Pandora Braithwaite to turn up. JK Rowling should have donated the money to charity. There are lots of Labour supporters like her who are totally out of touch with the modern day facts about that party.

  2. William Gruff (138 comments) says:

    Isn’t La Rowling a member of the Tartan McReich’s Führer’s circle of cronies? Rumours about which of the Jockerati is up the kilt of McWhom abound, and even include celebrity distraught parents The McCanns, but all we can really be sure of is that Sc*tland is an embarrassingly small and impoverished little country with limited resources and a much smaller pool of talent. Ms Rowling, being English, would be readily ‘snapped up’ by the culture and cattle raiders of North Br*tain and her Edinburgh husband’s prospects might well be dependent on her ‘flavour’ north of civilisation. Others have asked why Mrs Potter did not give more for the alleviation of poverty (I almost typed pottery) but the answer may be ‘staring them in the face’.

    PS: Oblique strokes before apostrophes: WTF is going on?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.