Apology accepted

! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.

Traitor Blair is resigning with effect from June 27th.

In his resignation speech he says that he has been “very blessed” to lead “the greatest nation on earth”.  We all know that in New Liebour-speak England isn’t a nation so that leaves Wales and Scotland.  So which nation has Tony been leading for the last 10 years?  Hmm, tough choice.

He also apologises for we he has “fallen short”.  It’s a bit cheeky trying to get away with one apology for 10 years of dictatorship, racism, apartheid and general incompetence but Tony, apology accepted.  Now fuck off.

9 comments

  1. Scaffold (146 comments) says:

    Amen

  2. A brummie (75 comments) says:

    Amen

  3. Sean Lynch (80 comments) says:

    Yep

  4. George (16 comments) says:

    Too true but he is only going to be followed by another FRISB (fucking right ignorant Scottish Bastard).

  5. Calum (183 comments) says:

    “It’s a bit cheeky trying to get away with one apology for 10 years of dictatorship, racism, apartheid and general incompetence but Tony, apology accepted.”

    You what? Are you off your nut? Your bigotry is unbelievable. Your constant accusations that the British Government is racist to the english – bullshit. The current Government is predominantley English, not Scottish as you seem to have tricked yourself into thinking. This is the most British of all Governments. You rant on about how apparentley this Scottish Raj is dictating to England, bull. How about in the 80’s when Thatcher and her, to use your terminology, English Raj ruled by diktat over Scotland and Wales, in spite of having only 1 or 2 MP’s in the respective nations. Britian and ALL its component states are far better now than they were when Labour came to office. And is a damm sight better than it would be were it to be split up, with right wing nationalists in England, people who would more accuratley be described as racist.

  6. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    Your constant accusations that the British Government is racist to the english – bullshit.

    Cancer drugs denied to the English because they’re English. That’s not racist? Scotland, Wales and NI get their own government but we don’t because we’re English. That’s not racist?

    The current Government is predominantley English, not Scottish as you seem to have tricked yourself into thinking.

    So the proportion of Scots in the cabinet isn’t higher than the proportion of the population Scots make up and there aren’t MPs elected in Scotland that run English-only government departments?

    This is the most British of all Governments.

    Because Britishness Brown says Britain when he means England? You’re talking out of your arse Calum.

    You rant on about how apparentley this Scottish Raj is dictating to England, bull. How about in the 80’s when Thatcher and her, to use your terminology, English Raj ruled by diktat over Scotland and Wales, in spite of having only 1 or 2 MP’s in the respective nations.

    You really have missed the point. The Thatcher government was a BRITISH government that governed the WHOLE OF BRITAIN in ALL MATTERS.

    Britian and ALL its component states are far better now than they were when Labour came to office.

    England is worse off.

    And is a damm sight better than it would be were it to be split up, with right wing nationalists in England, people who would more accuratley be described as racist.

    Why would England be worse off without the rest of the UK? Please tell me, nobody in New Liebour seems to be able to quantify their vague assertion that we’re better off together than apart. Why?

    Please also tell me why, as a nationalist, I’m a racist.

  7. Calum (183 comments) says:

    “You really have missed the point. The Thatcher government was a BRITISH government that governed the WHOLE OF BRITAIN in ALL MATTERS.”

    Her Government was a English government ruling Britian. How many non-English MP’s did she have? humm…?

    “Because Britishness Brown says Britain when he means England? You’re talking out of your arse Calum.”

    When Brown says Britian he means Britian, not just England, or Scotland or Wales or N. Ireland. Brown talks of the whole of Britian, not England, or Scotland etc… he talks of the entity as a whole.

    “Please also tell me why, as a nationalist, I’m a racist.”

    I am not accusing you of being a racist. Let me clarify my self. It is undeniable that english nationalism is far more right wing than nationalism in Scotland and Wales, English nationalism is a far more conventional form of nationalism than the centre left nationalism of other parts of the UK. The English Nationalists have members who are racist, as do other nationalist groups. Furthermore, the BNP are realy English not British nationalists, as are the NF. On the whole english nationalism is more right wing than the centerist nationalism of Scotland and Wales, it is therefore in my opinion a more dangerous and potentially a more potent and dangerous force. I can see the arguments for a federal UK and a devolved English P’ment as proposed by the EDP, yet they do have some members and supporters who are very right wing. I say this from experence, having meet some a few weeks ago, and being told to F off for having a celtic name (didn’t offend me as the guy was a prat), i know an extreme example but one none the less.

    “So the proportion of Scots in the cabinet isn’t higher than the proportion of the population Scots make up and there aren’t MPs elected in Scotland that run English-only government departments?”

    Fair enough about Scots running English only depts. However, if they are the best people for the job then i have no problem (saying that one to wind you up as much as anything else). The portion of Scots in the cabinet is reflective of the number of Scots elected by the people. The Government shouldn’t have to fit to a English quota as set out by you.

  8. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    Her Government was a English government ruling Britian. How many non-English MP’s did she have? humm…?

    It was a British government ruling Britain. Liebour doesn’t actually have a majority in any of the 4 home nations any more. They’re a minority government.

    When Brown says Britian he means Britian, not just England, or Scotland or Wales or N. Ireland. Brown talks of the whole of Britian, not England, or Scotland etc… he talks of the entity as a whole.

    That’s why his leadership election campaign is centred around education and health – two devolved issues.

    The Government shouldn’t have to fit to a English quota as set out by you.

    God no, no quotas. Out of interest, do you know how many cabinet ministers are English and elected in Scotland? One.

  9. Scaffold (146 comments) says:

    Dumbass Calum, he would mean Britain if North, West and North-West Britains wouldn’t be devolved. Can you finally point your blind eyes to the fact that Broon is going to run the countty he wasn’t elected in? You’re just plain stupid. Sorry Stuart, he’s geeting on my nerve. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.