Parliamentary secrecy bill could be abandoned

! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.

Support for the amendment to the Freedom of Information Act that will exempt MPs from the regulations has dropped significantly and it looks likely that the bill will be rejected by the Lords.

That is assuming, of course, that the bill makes it that far because divisions within the Commons means that the bill may run out of parliamentary time and have to start again in the next session of Parliament if it can get enough support.

MPs supporting the amendment claim that the change in the law is necessary to protect communications from their constituents but this argument is deliberate misinformation.  The law already prevents disclosure of personally identifiable information – there is no need to change the law to allow MPs to operate in complete secrecy and to deliberately withhold information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.