Durka Durka Tony Bliar Jihad #2

! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.

The religion of peace strikes again – two Asian males have driven a burning, petrol filled Jeep Cherokee into Glasgow airport.

Eyewitnesses say that the two Jihadi’s were pouring petrol onto the burning Jeep.

Blackpool Airport has been closed by armed police and Newcastle and Edinburgh Airports are on high alert.

The attempted bombings in London marked No Mandate Brown’s coronation and Traitor Bliar’s appointment as Middle East Peace Envoy.  Today’s attack marks the opening of the Scottish Parliament by the Queen.


  1. Calum (183 comments) says:

    This apparantley wasn’t a terrorist attack. The 2 guys were just pissed that they werent allowed to collect their bags or something.

    I must say, your stuff on Brown and Blair recentley has been crap. I haven’t seen site this week untill today and i am distinctly unimpressed.

  2. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    Really? Ok, let’s look at this sensibly …

    Could they have found several cans of petrol near an airport? No.
    Could they have bought several cans of petrol near an airport after the other day? Unlikely.
    Would they have set their £20k Jeep on fire, got in while it was burning and driven it through the front door of Glasgow airport just because they couldn’t get their bags?

    There’s one born every minute.

  3. Scaffold (146 comments) says:

    “This apparantley wasn’t a terrorist attack. The 2 guys were just pissed that they werent allowed to collect their bags or something.”

    Oh my God! Calum, you are utter idiot. Honestly, I can’t remember when I came across a person dumber than you for the last time.

  4. Calum (183 comments) says:

    Yea, sorry. I had only read early reports. Just read that it is being treated as a ‘terror related incident’.

    Thought news was odd, saying was as they couldn’t get their bags. So, terror level up to ‘critical’. Nice easy start for Jackie Smith and Gordon.

  5. Calum (183 comments) says:

    Scaffold. go eff yourself. I was merley saying what i understood to be the case form the early news reports i had read, when earlier today it was being reported, by all major news broadcasters, that the incident was simply 2 nut jobs, acting without any real motivation.

    As it turns out, it would appear that the guys are 2 nut jobs, just 2 nut jobs acting under the banner of islamic extremism.

    It looks like the car bombs and this have all been timed by whoever to coinside with Brown becoming PM.

    Scaffold, what is your problem eh? I f’king hate ya, so fair game. I dislike you due to your politics and your aloof attitude. Stop being a condosending prat. Whatever man. Look 4ward to a slagging match here, as you seem like the small kinda guy who would be easily riled by this little outburst. Bring it on, thats all i have to say!

    NB, thing on article by me was a genuine mistake, merley reporting what i had read early that morning, no1 is perfect, eh!

  6. Calum (183 comments) says:

    O yea, also what u mean by ‘There’s one born every minute.’ Mr Parr?

  7. Andi (82 comments) says:

    I would imagine, Calum, that he probably meant that you are an ill-educated tit.

  8. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    Calum, I’m saying that you’re gulible. You swallow whatever you’re told without even thinking about it if it fits in with your world view. You believe Liebour is good you will believe whatever tells you that’s true. You believe that the Jihadi’s aren’t that bad and you believe any story that tells you that’s true.

    You need to start questioning everything.

  9. Calum (183 comments) says:

    Stuart, i was merely saying what i had read earlier in the day.

    Tell me, how did you see that it was a terrorist attack? Did you read than from the news etc… If we are to question everything as you have said, then how do we know that these reports aren’t a load of shit? If there is some constant conspiracy theory then how do you know anything? If we are to question everything then who is to say it really was a terrorist attack? – could it not be some Labour conspiracy in league with the bias BBC or some other crap you people come up with?

    Why should we question everything as you say? Should i not question that in itself?

    Also, tell me, who is this grand puppet master controlling everything? What a load of shit!

    Also Andi, what is your problem. If you want we can have a real slagging match, as calling me thick is no insult at all. I was called thick before, and i showed those twats, so calling me thick holds no water. I sounding arrogation there, that isn’t how it is meant, but seriously mate, bring it on.

  10. Andi (82 comments) says:

    Really Calum. Allow me to present some evidence.

    “I sounding arrogation there, that isn’t how it is meant, but seriously mate, bring it on.”

    The prosecution rests.

  11. Calum (183 comments) says:

    What is you point Andi? I was saying, bring on the argument.

  12. Andi (82 comments) says:

    Calum, please see my previous response. When your balls have dropped and you are capable of stringing together a coherent sentence, you can bother me some more. Until then, just fuck off you clueless chump.

  13. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    LOL @ Andi. Cheered me up no end.

  14. Calum (183 comments) says:

    OMG andi, i am soo offended. Wow, you insinuated that because i am 16 that my balls haven’t dropped, wow how creative. I don’t know about you, but if by the time you were 16 your balls hadn’t dropped then you should have been worried.

    Anyway, would you like to explain my incoherence. If anyone here is incoherent it is you, you cannot follow the argument, so resort to petty bitching and name calling. I think that such a response is ever so mature. In fact, that is making me wonder if you are just a pre pubesent girl, too immature and petty to argue on issues, that you decide to just moan and whine like a 4 year old.

    Grow up mate. When you are prepared to argue on issues them talk to me. Untill then don’t waste my time.

  15. Andi (82 comments) says:

    Dear Calum,

    I am very sorry to have caused you such offence with my comments. I am also very sorry to see that your balls haven’t dropped – you should follow your own advice and get that checked out. Fortunately, all those years ago when I reached your advanced age, my balls had already dropped, and they continue to work perfectly to this very day – something for which I am very thankful.

    Moving on to the subject of your incoherence: no I would not like to explain this. Your incoherence is your own problem, and therefore yours to explain. If I had to explain every one of your issues to you, I have a feeling that I would be here for a very long time.

    You go on to say that it is I who is incoherent. I understand this “argument” perfectly Calum, however considering that the whole thing started because you are too stupid to be able to adequately tell the difference between a terrorist attack and an angry customer, I feel no need to contribute any further evidence in support of your idiocy. I accept that I do move from the point from time to time, but if you lack the intellect to properly follow and assimilate a multi-threaded conversation, even in an electronic format such as this, then you probably shouldn’t be allowed the use of a computer.

    Stepping swiftly to the next point: you think I’m a pre-pubescent girl. With balls? Have you ever been to see a counsellor Calum? If you are entertaining thoughts like these, especially about a stranger you have only recently met in the comments section of a political blog, I really think you ought to. Oh, and by the way, I find it very ironic that you deride me because I called you a few petty names, then you go on to do the same to me. Something like this only serves to scupper your argument in the eyes of any readers with intellect: do please think about what you want to say before you start putting fingers to keys, there’s a good boy.

    Finally on two closing notes, I think firstly you should heed your own words of advice. When you are capable of understanding issues and debating them you can talk to me. Secondly I am not wasting your time – you are wasting your own by rising to the bait that others set for you – yet further proof of your immaturity.

  16. Calum (183 comments) says:

    Oh well done! You noticed the EVER so subtle irony in how i insulted you. Oh bravo, aren’t you a clever boy then eh?

    I accept that it was an incident of my foolishness which sparket this whole thing off, i was merley communicating what i had read, which was incorrect. I appologise for that, nobody’s perfect eh? I merley reported what i had read from inital reports in the early morning. I appologise again for merley reporting the false reports of the early morning.

    Back to the past post. Did you even read what i wrote? After being soooooooooooooooooo offended by your post wherein you said me balls hadn’t dropped, a really gr8 insult, which showed how sophisticated you are (about as sophisticated and incisive as a 13 year old.) After this i took great offence, which lead to me crying into my pillow for days. So well done for being so incredibly offensive. A feat which you repeated in your last post, where you showed how incredibley clever you are by totally misreading and misinterpretating what i typed – bravo.

    Quite how you got “am also very sorry to see that your balls haven’t dropped – you should follow your own advice and get that checked out.” from
    “I don’t know about you, but if by the time you were 16 your balls hadn’t dropped then you should have been worried.”
    is a mystery to me. If you had half a brain you would have seen what is meant by that. I will spell it out for you just to be sure – after you said to basically get lost untill my “your balls have dropped” i replied that if you thought that my balls hadn’t dropped by 16, which coincidentely they have, then you may have had a problem for if you thought that by 16 mine hadn’t dropped then one would worry that by 16 yours hadn’t dropped.

    Having spelt that out to you in a fairly wordy way i hope you understood what was meant.

    Anyway, if all this is going to be is a slagging match then i realy cannot be bothered. It is too much of a waste of time when i should instead be doing my work if i ‘m not out with some mates. Look, Andi, i sure as hell don’t like you, and you don’t seem to like me either. Fair enough. So lets leave it at that. However, if you do respond to this in even a vaugley provocative way then i will respond in turm. I am a very persistant young man, and mark my words, i will get the last word. Especially in argument with a prick like you.

    Adios amigo.

  17. Andi (82 comments) says:

    “You noticed the EVER so subtle irony in how i insulted you” – Yes I did. Although it was more a collection of meaningless words than an insult.

    “Oh bravo, aren’t you a clever boy then eh?” – Yes I am.

    “i hope you understood what was meant.” – I understood perfectly in the first place. Although, after reading your “wordy” explaination I believe you should run your comments past a spell checker before posting them. Your grasp of the English language seems fairly basic, and having your posts spell checked would go some way towards covering up your ignorance in the use of such a basic tool as our wonderful language.

    “i sure as hell don’t like you” – the feeling is mutual.

    “i will get the last word” – no you won’t Calum.

  18. Calum (183 comments) says:

    I shall respond to you last comment in a similar way to the comment itself, i.e quote and comment.

    “Although it was more a collection of meaningless words than an insult.” – So rather similar to your so called ‘insults’. Furthermore, i wasn’t trying to be insulting, i was merely pointing out my observations, in a rather insulting manner.

    ““Oh bravo, aren’t you a clever boy then eh?” – Yes I am.”
    That made me laugh, as in not at you, but with you, that was vaugley funny, if not a little obvious.

    Also, on my typos/spelling. There were so many mistakes for 2 reasons.
    1. I was typing quickly for 2 reasons, the first being that i was in a rush as i was going out, secondly, because i haven’t got much time for you, so typed it as quickly as i didn’t want to wast too much time on you and your pathetic bitching.
    2. On spelling, i couldn’t be bothered to paste my comments into word to spellcheck them, i actually have a life, and secondly i am dyslexic (i think that is how it is spelt!).

  19. Calum (183 comments) says:

    Looks like i got the last word!

  20. Andi (82 comments) says:

    No Calum you didn’t.

    You’re still an ill-educated retard. A half-wit spastic. A fresh, wet turd just waiting to be stepped on.

    You’re only sixteen years old, and yet you expect people to believe that you have fully rounded and matured political ideas and opinions — when you clearly don’t.

  21. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    Actually, I’ve got the last word.