EU Cost/Benefit Analysis petition has 600 signatures

! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.

The petition I started calling for a Cost/Benefit Analysis of membership of the EU has just had its 600th signature.

If you haven’t signed it yet, please do so.  If you have signed it, please forward it on to all your contacts and ask them to sign it as well.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

One comment

  1. Kevin Fulcher (20 comments) says:

    I see that the arch-integrator, Barrosa, was in Norway this last week, trying to persuade the Norwegians that their two ‘No’ votes to EU membership have been the wrong answer; the Norwegians enjoy a high standard of living, have control of their own laws, borders, industry, agriculture and fish stocks, export more per capita to the EU than we do, and haven’t had the benefit of their country being dismembered with contempt into the ‘Norwegian Regions’ run by un-elected quangos appointed by an unrepresentative non-mandated clique. What a BAD EXAMPLE they set! Cheers, Kevin F.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.