Letter on Jack Straw’s veto of 1997 devolution meeting minutes
On 10th December I sent a letter to my MP, David Wright, about the British Home Secretary, Jack Straw, vetoing the release of minutes of a 1997 cabinet meeting on devolution via WriteToThem.com. He didn’t reply but he’s just agreed on Twitter to reply to questions I’ve asked him on Twitter and to my letter so here it is and I’ll post his reply when he replies.
Dear David,
The British Home Secretary, Jack Straw, has vetoed the release of minutes of the 1997 cabinet meeting on devolution to Scotland, Wales and “the English Regions”.
This is only the second time that a ruling by the Information Commissioner to release information has been vetoed by the Home Secretary.
What was said in a meeting about devolution that was so dangerous that it can’t be made public? What deals were done to break up England and preserve the dominance of Scottish politicians?
I think we all need to know just how much of the current discrimination and Britification of England goes back to shady deals done in that cabinet meeting and what the ultimate objective is. Is the status quo of a neutered England in a Scottish-dominated union all that was intended or was the complete abolition of England ordained in 1997? The cabinet meeting was about long term policy for the union, I think we have a right to know exactly what the British have planned for us. I urge you to speak to your Home Secretary and ask him to rethink his decision to keep this information secret.
Stuart
I have to say that while I don’t rate him as a politician, he does make more of an effort on Twitter than most.
This entry was posted
by wonkotsane on Tuesday, January 5th, 2010 at 7:26 pm and is filed under Police State and is tagged with Devolution, Jack Straw, Letter.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
