Archive for BBC Bias

BBC Bias

The BBC has been accused of anti-English bias before and refuted those accusations. The BBC Have Your Say pages have been updated recently so you can see a history of your comments and their status (ie. whether they were published, unpublished or rejected).

Below is a list of comments I’ve submitted through Have Your Say either on the subject of the West Lothian Question or Englishness in general which have been unpublished or rejected.

To put this into context, I’ve had just 5 comments published on the same subjects.

DEBATE:
Should Herceptin be offered on the NHS?

SENT:
15-Feb-2006 12:15

COMMENT:
Herceptin is available in Scotland where they can afford the drug purely and simply because of the subsidies paid to them by English taxpayers. Some of these English taxpayers are now dying from breast cancer and are refused Herceptin because the English NHS can’t afford it. This is how Britain works under New Labour and this is how it will continue to work until England gets a parliament to run its own affairs.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should there be an English parliament?

SENT:
10-Mar-2006 12:27

COMMENT:
Of course England should have it’s own parliament. At the moment we have a British government dominated by Scots who are unaccountable to the English passing laws that don’t affect their own constituents. These same MP’s, devoid of any morals or sense of fairness, have forced through several pieces of legislation by way of the Labour whip that only affect England and that English MP’s have rejected. Restricting voting rights in the British parliament will never work. England has to have its own parliament. To deny democracy and representation to 50m people based on their nationality is racist, discriminatory and plain wrong.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should there be an English parliament?

SENT:
10-Mar-2006 13:04

COMMENT:
English subsidy given to Scotland last year: £11.3bn Revenues from north sea oil and gas last year: £7bn Net subsidy: £4.3bn I really wish the Scottish Parliament would spend some of our hard earnt English pounds in teaching Scottish people some basic maths. Oil and gas revenues are paid to the British treasury, the same as revenues from English industry are paid to the British treasury. Why should Scotland be treated any differently? When will Scots finally accept that they have were bankrupt before the union and English taxes have been keeping them solvent since 1707?

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should there be an English parliament?

SENT:
10-Mar-2006 14:55

COMMENT:
I wonder how many English people, Scottish Lord Falconer has spoken to about devolution. Nobody I know of.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should there be an English parliament?

SENT:
11-Mar-2006 20:08

COMMENT:
“No, we have enough politicians with there heads stuck in the trough of tax payers money.” An English Parliament doesn’t have to mean more politicians, more bureaucracy or more expense. The British government can be cut by a good 75% as over 80% of its work now only affects England. An English Parliament would be different government, not more. Stop regurgitating Labour propaganda and thing for yourself.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
What would you like to see in Budget 2006?

SENT:
22-Mar-2006 12:17

COMMENT:
More tax on Scottish whiskey would be good to try and pay back some of their £11.3bn subsidy from English taxes. An increase in income tax for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would also be useful for the same reasons.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Are elderly people being neglected by the health system?

SENT:
30-Mar-2006 11:06

COMMENT:
English taxes are paying for free social care for the elderly in Scotland and Wales already, why shouldn’t we expect our own people to get the same benefits?

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should Blair name a departure date?

SENT:
09-May-2006 11:39

COMMENT:
The electorate voted Tony Bliar into office, not a Scottish MP with no mandate to govern 85% of the population. It is time for the Queen to disolve parliament and call a general election. She has a duty to protect her people and this Labour government is a bigger threat to freedom and democracy in England than muslim terrorists.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
What are the ‘core British values’?

SENT:
15-May-2006 20:23

COMMENT:
“British” values? Depends who you class as British really. Only English children are going to be taught these “British” values so surely they should be “English” values instead? What’s the point in teaching English children “British” values and not Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish children? Ulterior motive anyone?

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Was Reid right to attack paedophile sentence?

SENT:
15-Jun-2006 09:29

COMMENT:
Why is a Scottish Lord so interested in English law and order anyway? In fact, why do we have an unelected Scottish Lord as Lord Chancellor of England? Why doesn’t Scottish Labour butt out of English affairs and let an English person sort out English law and English judges?

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should limits on Sunday trading be removed?

SENT:
06-Jul-2006 15:13

COMMENT:
Why is Alistair Darling, an MP elected in Scotland, even allowed to make this decision anyway? His constituents elected him to represent their interests in parliament, not to tell English people whether shops in England are allowed to open on a Sunday. His own constituents can shop anywhere on a Sunday because his own constituency is in Scotland where they don’t have Sunday trading laws. It’s time to stop these foreign MP’s from interfering in our business. If I want to go to Asda at 7pm on a Sunday then why should an MP from a different country be allowed to tell me I can’t?

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Will devolution return to Northern Ireland?

SENT:
14-Oct-2006 15:26

COMMENT:
Good news for NI, shame England is still denied equality with the rest of the UK and Europe by the Scottish Labour Party.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Should A&E departments be closed?

SENT:
06-Dec-2006 08:30

COMMENT:
If English taxes were spent on English hospitals instead of subsidising the Scottish and Welsh NHS then we wouldn’t have this problem. Last year, a subsidy of over £11bn of English was given to Scotland by Gordon Brown to enable them to pay for, amongst other things, expensive cancer treatments like Herceptin which English women were refused. English taxes should be spent on English people and *if* there is anything left it can be shared.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Is land overprotected?

SENT:
06-Dec-2006 08:34

COMMENT:
Any changes to England’s planning laws should be decided solely by MP’s elected in England, not by all British MP’s. “England’s green and pleasant land” will soon be a distant memory if the Scottish Raj are allowed to “reform” our planning laws.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
How diverse is multicultural Britain?

SENT:
08-Dec-2006 15:06

COMMENT:
By talking about “muslim communities”, Bliar not only acknowledges that they aren’t integrated into our society but that he also thinks of muslims – and other immigrant groups – as different, separate to the rest of society. And tolerance? Even the natives of “Britain” aren’t tolerant of each other. Ask the disabled man or 7 year old boy that got beaten up in Scotland for being English about how tolerance is part of being “British”. There is no “British” any more, it’s a dead nationality.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Have you been affected by stormy weather?

SENT:
18-Jan-2007 14:07

COMMENT:
Dear Val from Elgin, we can’t afford to grit in England because we’re paying for your gritters in Scotland. And your health service. And your university fees. And …

COMMENT STATUS:
Rejected

DEBATE:
Should schools teach ‘Britishness’?

SENT:
26-Jan-2007 08:57

COMMENT:
My kids are English, not British and I won’t let any teacher tell them that’s wrong. These Britishness lessons will only be taught in England – Scottish and Welsh kids will continue to have their own national identity encouraged. I would rather teach my kids from home than let them be brainwashed into being British.

COMMENT STATUS:
Unpublished

DEBATE:
Will power-sharing work in Northern Ireland?

SENT:
08-May-2007 17:19

COMMENT:
When will England get home rule? We’re paying for the “peace dividend”, we’re paying billions in subsidies to NI, Scotland and Wales and what do we get in return? Foreign MPs interfering in matters that only affect England! England is now the only nation in Europe that doesn’t have its own government.

COMMENT STATUS:
Awaiting moderation

DEBATE:
Will Gordon Brown be a good leader?

SENT:
11-May-2007 17:44

COMMENT:
How dare Gordon Brown base his leadership election on health and education! Health and education are both devolved in Scotland – he has no say over either of those matters in Scotland where he was elected. When Gordon Brown was elected he wasn’t elected for his policies on the English NHS or education systems, he has NO MANDATE on any devolved issues. What a nerve!

COMMENT STATUS:
Awaiting moderation

DEBATE:
Will Gordon Brown be a good leader?

SENT:
17-May-2007 21:30

COMMENT:
All of Gordon Brown’s “domestic policies” all relate to England. None of them apply to Scotland where he was elected. Gordon Brown has no mandate.

COMMENT STATUS:
Awaiting moderation

BBC confusing England and Britain again

The BBC are confusing England and Britain again.  In this story about the poor availability of cancer drugs they keep referring to the UK when they actually mean England.

England doesn’t have access to the best cancer drugs because they’re so expensive.  They are, however, quite often available in the rest of the UK at the expense of the English taxpayer.  In this news report, however, the BBC makes no distinction between the different treatment and the way the NHS is run in the different home nations.

For instance, they say “In the NHS, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has responsibility for recommending if new drug treatments should be provided by the health service.”  This only applies to England – in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland they have control of their own NHS and regularly prescribe drugs that NICE hasn’t licensed or has refused to provide in England.

The BBC’s neglect in reporting the true scope of the problem – ie. it is England that has the problem, our neighbours get much better access to cancer drugs – is compounding the problem because it masks the true extent of medical apartheid from the public both in England and abroad.  The British government should be exposed for the anti-English, racist establishment it is.

BBC St Georges Day poll

There is a poll on the BBC News website asking if St Geroges Day should be a public holiday or not.

The poll currently stands at 85.78% in favour with 4,994 votes.

However, it wouldn’t be the BBC without a bit of anti-English bias – despite 4,280 votes in favour of a St Georges Day public holiday, out of all the comments they received the only one worthy or publishing and most representative of public opinion was …

Why do we need to celebrate dimwitted pursuits such as patriotism?

 

Only 3 countries have elections in BBCland

The Biased Broadcasting Corporation always deny that they are anti-English.  They have a BBC Scotland, BBC Wales and BBC Northern Ireland.  They have a BBC English Regions which is making an increasing amount of BBC2’s programmes but there is no BBC England.

There’s an election in May, you might have heard mention of it.  The BBC have launched their Election 07 blogs: Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

It looks like there are only 3 countries having elections in BBCland.

BBC Scotland: Divisions rage despite the Union

The BBC News website has an article on the union in which the writer – a political editor for BBC Scotland – questions the value of the union.

The article only appears on the Scotland pages of course, we can’t have English people seeing someone questioning the value of the union after all.

The article asks “So just how should we commemorate the Act of Union – whose tricentenary falls next year?” and concludes:

In each case, we should ask: would Scotland, would the UK, be better served in these areas by sustaining or repealing the Union? Is it too much to expect a mature, evidence-based debate, relatively free from rancour and bile? Given how much is at stake, it probably is. However, I ask nonetheless.

The BBC Have Your Say can be found … nowhere.  There isn’t one.  Typical stuff from the BBC – talk about the union but only in Scotland and dont, under any circumstances, give anyone an opportunity to actually express an opinion unless it’s the “right one”.

Why is it always the English that pay?

Alistair Darling, the English Transport Minister elected in Scotland, is set to introduce a pay-as-you-drive scam in England but not in Scotland where he was elected.

The story was reported on BBC Breakfast this morning, minus the bits about the discrimination unsurprisingly.

Why is it always the English that pay?  Even when Scots drive in England they won’t have to pay because they won’t have the tracking equipment fitted to their cars.

More press coverage of English devolution/independence

No matter how hard the BBC try to bury the story, it just isn’t going away …

The Business

Next May is the 300th anniversary of the Union of the Scottish and English Parliaments, which followed the Union of the Crowns in 1603 and began the United Kingdom. It should be a cause for much celebration of one of the most successful Unions the world has ever seen, one which (along with the Welsh and the Ulster-Scots) dominated the 19th century through the British Empire, played a crucial role in seeing off the great 20th century evils of fascism and communism and which remains an important economic, diplomatic and military power, even in the 21st century.

But instead of celebration the air is thick with talk of divorce on both sides of the border. What was put together in 1707 might soon be about to come apart. It has not yet dawned on the rest of the world that, in the foreseeable future, there might not be a United Kingdom.
(more)

International Herald Tribune

LONDON: A majority of British voters support Scottish independence and the breakup of the country’s 300-year-old union with England, a poll released Sunday suggests.

Fifty-two percent of Scots polled by ICM supported Scottish independence, as did 59 percent of English voters.

The 1707 Act of Union joined England and Scotland under a single Parliament and monarch. Scottish independence has risen on the political agenda since the country was granted its own parliament, with power over many domestic functions, by Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government in 1999.
(more)

Daily Telegraph

One of the more astonishing features of our politics is the way in which really quite clever and experienced people fail, from time to time, to see the blindingly obvious. One example is the way in which some of those around Tony Blair — and for all I know Mr Blair himself — have believed, on and off over the past few years, that it might be possible to stop Gordon Brown becoming PM. Another was the even more foolish, and much more widely held, fantasy that granting devolution to Scotland would not, sooner rather than later, lead to a rampant rise of Scottish nationalism. As the more astute among you will immediately realise, these two concerns are inextricably linked.
(more)

The Herald

So, what’s the worst that could happen? If the opinion polls are broadly correct, and the SNP is returned as the largest party in May, what could be the realistic downside, given that most people seem to have dismissed Tony Blair’s forecasts of constitutional apocalypse?

he reaction to the government’s warnings about families being split asunder and the nation being left defenceless has been one of bemused disdain in the Scottish press – traditionally a bastion of unionism. Times change.
(more)

The Guardian 

I think the word is panic. Last week the prime minister, chancellor of the exchequer, home secretary, defence secretary, trade secretary and Scots ministerial expatriates galore travelled in a posse north to a Labour conference in Oban, like a bunch of Spanish hidalgos racing back from the fleshpots of Madrid to quell a revolt in their home province.

Their objective was to suppress one man, Alex Salmond, leader of the Scottish National party. An opinion poll had shown support for Salmond’s crusade, an independent Scotland, rising to 52% of the electorate. Those regarding themselves as Scottish had risen from half to three-quarters in 25 years, while those saying “British” had halved to just 20%.

This is raw politics. Labour desperately needs its 40 or so Scottish seats at Westminster. Gordon Brown, probably the next prime minister, wears his distaste for England on his sleeve, and English voters sense it. Already devolution has subverted the legitimacy of Scots MPs in voting on English bills. Just when the 300th anniversary of the 1707 Act of Union is about to be celebrated, it seems to be falling apart, and Labour’s electoral fortunes with it. Battle will be joined next May in the Scottish parliamentary elections.
(more)

BBC censorship over independence poll

Yesterday’s poll in the Sunday Telegraph was possibly the most important news story of the year.  The results of the poll combined with the SNP’s projected win in the Scottish elections means that it is increasingly likely that the 300th anniversary of the Act of Union next year will be the last.

So where is the coverage on the BBC?  Not so much as a mention on BBC Breakfast this morning as I was eating my Weetabix and not a bean on the front page of the BBC News website.  The story is, in fact, hidden away on the Scottish Politics page of the BBC News website where most English people wouldn’t look.  Predictable censorship from the BBC who must surely wondering what will happen to the British Broadcasting Corporation when there is no long a Britain to broadcast to.

Even the Sun managed to find space amongst the usual stories about who’s shagging who and Pete Docherty getting arrested for posession of cocaine again (I made this up but it’s probably true) to publish a fairly meaty report by the Sun’s standards.

The Scottish Home Secretary (who has hardly any control over Scotland), John Reid, says that independence would be bad because our children and grandchildren would be required to choose between a Scottish or Welsh passport.  I’m sure there’s a point there but I must be missing it.  Legislation could be introduced post independence to allow free movement of citizens within the UK – we already have free movement of citizens within the EU, there’s no reason why we couldn’t do the same without.

CEP complaint on BBC bias

Mike Knowles, the chairman of the Campaign for an English Parliament (CEP), has written a strongly worded letter of complaint to the BBC over its anti-English bias in general and specifically over this regionalisation “story” which I covered the other day.

On a related note, anyone in the West Midlands who is opposed to – or wants more information on – the regions should visit the West Midlands NO! Campaign.

BBC regional government spin

The BBC have carried out a poll in the North East euroregion on devolution and concluded that there is support for regional government because 69% want local control on issues such as transport.  The people questioned said they didn’t like unelected regional assemblies and only 20% of people think they do a worthwhile job.

The results of the survey do not indicate support for regional government.  The results say that the people of the North East want more control of local affairs.  The BBC doesn’t suggest that perhaps the desire to have more local control over transport is down to the fact that an MP elected in North Britain has control of England’s transport, something the people in the North East are particularly aware of and increasingly vocal about.

The answer to unaccountable central government is not regionalisation.  Regional government is not accountable, nor is it popular.  The British government is highly centralised as far as England is concerned but what people do not want is centralised regional government.  The euroregions, city regions and the new transnational regions aren’t local, they’re regional.  The West Midlands euroregion is a perfect example of how a single regional policy can’t be suitable for the whole region – it contains one of the largest urban sprawls in England at one extreme and the most rural county in England at the other.

It is clear that there is no real support for regional government in the North East or elsewhere in England which only leaves the question of why the BBC would choose to spin this story so outrageously to suggest that there is.  Could it be anything to do with the funding that the European Federation – the architects and chief supporters of the regions – give to the BBC to fund varied programming including news an education?

Holby City – BBC misses opportunity to expose EU

Whilst sitting on the sofa in agony last night (I’ll explain later) I watched Holby City with Mrs Sane.

Part of the plot was an … unconventional … doctor who decided to help out a patient who had sold her kidney on the black market to pay for AIDS medication for her brother in Ghana.  Twice during the programme he got into a heated discussion with a pharmacist and another doctor about why their returned drugs were destroyed instead of given away to Africa.  “Go on say it” I screamed to myself.  “Tell the viewers why perfectly good drugs are thrown away instead of being donated to needy people”.

“It’s illegal” shouted one of the doctors.  No, the moment has gone and the BBC has missed yet

another opportunity to expose the European Federation and the stupid laws that it is flooding our statute books with.  The NHS used to send returned drugs to Africa but the European Federation banned it.

Has wonko been banned from Nick Robinson’s blog?

Nick Robinson’s blog on the BBC News website had some coverage of Boris getting himself into trouble.

I posted a couple of comments, one of them explaining what Boris meant to say about the Ignorant Jock not being suitable for Prime Minister and one of them debunking the oft-peddled myth that North Sea oil subsidises England.  Imagine my surprise today when I tried to post a comment explaining why the British Conservative government of the 80’s and 90’s governing North Britain with a minority is completely different to the post-devolution British Labour government governing England with a minority and was greeted by a message saying I wasn’t allowed to post comments!