Archive for Labour

Right is right

The Conswervative Party in Derby reckon that 300 Liebour members are defecting tonight to the Conswervatives.

So confident are they that it will happen that Caroline Spellman, the Conswervative Party Chairman, is travelling to Derby to receive them.

It would be funny if this was a wind-up and the Tories were left with egg on their faces but I think that it’s genuine.  I don’t support the Conswervatives but right is right.  Liebour is haemoraghing members and struggling to service £30m of debts.  It’s time they did the decent thing and wound the rotten party up.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Hat-tip: Daily Referendum

Resistance is futile, you WILL be federated

There is, I believe, a deliberate attempt to stifle all dissent and opposition throughout Federal Europe.

The “speaker” of the EU Parliament has been given the power to arbitarily decide who can and can’t speak in the EU Parliament after UKIP MEPs staged a legitimate protest against the EU Constitution.  This was done to protect freedom of speech, apparently.

Now Liebour MPs are kicking off because 4 of their MPs are supporting the  group.  The efforts of the Liebour Party to stop this deviation from policy are extreme – they actually threatened the 4 MPs involved with expulsion from the parliamentary party if they didn’t withdraw support.  Sadly, Frank field and Kate Hoey have withdrawn public support for  after Geoff Hoon threatened to kick them out of their party for wanting to honour their manifesto pledge.

Liebour has gone on the offensive making vague and apparently baseless suggestions that  is a bit of a shady organisation, offering no specific examples of wrongdoing and never actually coming out and accusing them of anything but sowing the seeds of doubt.

Liebour has become more and more authoritarian and this is a pattern repeated throughout Federal Europe.  Attempts to force democratic votes are suppressed and in Portugal, two thirds of the political parties there are being made illegal through a new law due to come into effect soon.

The question is, is this just Liebour being a bunch of facist control freaks because they like the idea of being jackbooted nazi’s or is it a co-ordinated effort throughout Federal Europe to supress freedom of speech, the right to protest and the democratic process?

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

More sleaze at Westminster

A couple of weeks ago I hypothesised that Liebour were intentionally bringing disrepute to Westminster over party funding to make state-funding appear to be the only option left to stop the corruption.

Derek Conway, a Conswervative MP, has just been given a bollocking for paying over £45k to his son from his parliamentary expenses over four years whilst employing him as a part time research assistant.  This was whilst he was studying full time at university.  It now transpires that he has paid similar amounts to his wife and other son.

He has been ordered to repay part of the money, suspended from Parliament for 10 sitting days and been expelled from the Conswervative Party.  Contrast this with the Liebour MPs and MSP that have admitted taking illegal donations and failing to declare loans and donations.  Only Peter Hain has resigned and as far as I know, only he and Wendy Alexander MSP are being investigated by the police.  Both are still in the Liebour Party.

Up until now, only Liebour have been found to have taken illegal donations so it would have been difficult to gloss over the fact that they are the single cause of the problem to justify such a major change to the political system as state funding of political parties.  However, now a Tory MP is being investigated by the police over improper use of public money, this gives them the “evidence” they needed to bring in measures that encompass the whole political system and not just their own rotten party.

The timing couldn’t be better, I predict an announcement on state funding of political parties within the next fortnight.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

Party Politics should be banned

James Purnell, the new Work & Pension Secretary, has said that Liebour’s reputation hasn’t been tainted by all the recent sleaze and corruption amongst senior members of the party and says that they’re doing “hat is right” in reforming their funding arrangements.

Reform, reform, reform.  We all know what reform means – take something that works and balls it up so that it breaks.  Yes, the party funding system is being abused but that’s not because the system needs reforming, it’s because Liebour are a bunch of fucking crooks.  The rules have already been tightened up by Liebour ministers after Liebour ministers were caught selling peerages.  Now some more Liebour ministers have been found to be abusing the party funding system in taking illegal loans and donations and/or not declaring loans and donations and Liebour ministers are going to change the rules again.  Does anyone else notice a pattern here?

Liebour have made no secret of the fact that they support state funding of political parties but why should we, the taxpayer, fund a political party known to be corrupt and which has employed a convicted fraudster not once, but three times, to a senior cabinet position only for him to resign after being caught committing fraud?  Why, in fact, should the taxpayer fund any political party?  If they can’t get the support they need through their membership and through lawful donations then they don’t deserve any money.  Most people vote for a party, not because they believe in what the party stands for – most of them probably couldn’t name 3 policies from their manifesto – but because they’ve always voted for that party, because their parents always voted for that party or because they just don’t want the opposition.  If they’re not prepared to put their hands in their pockets once a year and pay for membership of that party then why should their vote imply support for the party and earn them taxpayer funding?  If parties were made to rely solely on donations and subscriptions from their members then they will get as much money as they deserve.  If they do a good job they will attract more members, if they do a bad job they will lose them.

There is no justification for a political party to be tens of millions of pounds in debt or to spend 2 or 3 million on an election campaign.  There is no need for consultants and focus groups and hugely expensive trips round the country kissing babies and smiling for cameras.  There is no need for a cabinet minister to travel the length of the country to shake hands with a carefully selected group of party members in front of a TV crew to pretend their sitting MP isn’t shitting himself at the news that his majority has dropped to 3 people and a goldfish.

Party politics has turned into a circus, it’s rotten to the core.  It’s not about dedicating your life to public service any more, it’s about a three figure salary and expenses and securing a handful of company directorships to tide you over when you get caught with your fingers in the till and have to resign to spend more time with your family until your gold-plated, index-linked, final salary, taxpayer-funded pension starts paying out.

I would happily see party politics banned, the whip banned and MPs go back to forming loose alliances on individual issues.  A century ago the Commons was full of independent MPs, now they’re as rare as rocking horse shit and they never get a chance to do anything because government has been bent round the party system.  Why must the Speaker belong to a party with the resulting accusations (usually well-founded in the case of Brit-Scot Liebour Speaker, Michael Martin) of partiality?  Why must the Prime Minister belong to a party?  At the very least, the Speaker should be an independent MP and seperate elections held for the office of Prime Minister.

Party politics has largely turned the electorate off politics altogether.  Only a third of the population bother to vote and it’s hardly surprising.  Liebour is constantly mired in sleaze and corruption, the Conswervatives are too busy trying to reinvent themselves as the new left and the Lib Dums … not even they know what they’re supposed to stand for.  None of the three main parties are worth voting for because there’s very little to seperate them and most MPs will vote however they’re told to vote by their party.  The reading of the EU (Amendment) Bill the other night was a perfect example – only about 20 MPs bothered to turn up for the debate on the bill despite only having four hours to read, digest and form an opinion on a bill that was hundreds – if not thousands – of pages long.  They didn’t vote according to their conscience or the wishes of their constituents, they voted how they were told by their party.

Imagine for a moment that the Prime Minister was an independent and there was no party whip.  How would the EU (Amendment) Bill debate have gone?  There would have been more MPs at the debate for a start and the vote wouldn’t have taken place a mere six hours after MPs had been given the consolidated text of the bill.  The Liebour MPs who rebelled against their party on the night would have formed an alliance with the Conswervative and Lib Dum MPs who were opposing the bill weeks before and more MPs would have joined them.  A referendum would have been secured, I have no doubt of that.  But it wasn’t because the whips told them how to vote and all but a few did as they were told and voted against the wishes of their constituents.

There is a very simple principle which has been set aside of late – MPs are elected to represent the interests of their constituents, not their party.  Until party politics is banned in Westminster, government will be run by the party for the benefit of the party.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Millibeast talks shit … again

Somewhere in the history of the Milliband clan someone must have been on the receiving end of a particularly powerful gypsy curse.  I can’t think of any other reason why the Millibeasts would talk complete shit every single time they open their mouths.

David the Millibeast will tell the Fabian Society, one of Liebour’s propaganda sockpuppets, that Liebour needs to show it is excited by the prospect of a fourth term in government rather than exhausted by it.  He will also tell them that the UK isn’t the bridge between the US and Europe but rather a “global hub” linking world “networks”.

I will show restraint by addressing his first statement first.  Liebour members are struggling to get excited by the prospect of the next election because they’ve made themselves unelectable.  Bottler Brown bottled out of holding an early election while Liebour was basking in the “Brown bounce” because even with a new leader he knew that they were unelectable.  Why waste energy getting excited about the prospect of winning the next election when everyone knows full well that they are unelectable.

Now onto the newspeak.  Global hub?  World networks?  This is a country you’re making trying – and failing – to run here, not a fucking company.  I’d expect a PR consultant or a marketing person to come with that kind of shit which, no doubt, they did.  It’s not as if the Millibeasts have the gumption to write a speech by themselves, not with the gypsy curse.  We do more trade with the US than we do with the entire continent of Europe and comments like this from the Foreign Secretary won’t do much for our relationship with our biggest trade partner.

What hope is there for any of us with cretins like this in charge?

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

One down, two to go

Teflon Hain has got been given the green light over breaking the Ministerial Code of Practice after the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Gus O’Donnell, decided that taking donations off two companies for his leadership campaign and then endorsing both companies was perfectly acceptable.

It now falls on the Electoral Commission and the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner to nail his crooked ass to the wall.  If the Electoral Commission find some balls in time to decide that he’s broken the law again (he already has a conviction for fraud) then the police will be called in to investigate.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Hypocritical Liebour

Two Liebour MPs have asked the Electoral Commission to investigate eighty Conswervative MPs over donations from “patrons clubs”.

They said that the Conservative MPs will end up paying back thousands of pounds of donations but the Conswervatives reckon that Liebour has received £2m in donations from “patrons clubs” themselves!

This is a truly pathetic attempt to divert attention from Peter Hain’s criminal failure to declare £103,000 in donations, some of which were illegally donated via a third party without the donor’s consent.

But perhaps there’s an ulterior motive at work here.  How many Liebour MPs and MSPs have been caught taking illegal donations or not declaring donations?  Four or five?  And why would Liebour MPs shoot themselves in the foot by asking the Electoral Commission to investigate donations to the Conswervatives from “patrons clubs” when they have received far more in donations from the same type of Liebour-supporting groups?  Could this be a deliberate attempt to bring so much disrepute to Westminster that the public will be convinced of the need for state funding of political parties?

If criminal convictions don’t come out of this then serious questions need to be asked of the Electoral Commission and the Metropolitan Police, both of which have so far failed to secure a single conviction for serious fraud committed by Liebour MPs.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

Hain’s Fucked

Peter Hain is being investigated by the Electoral Commission and the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner over his failure to disclose £103,000 in donations to his deputy leadership campaign.

This is 54% of the total donations to his deputy leadership campaign but it was an “innocent mistake” according to Hain.

£35,000 of the £103,000 came from the Progressive Policy Forum (PPF), a sockpuppet New Liebour think tank.  The money was donated to the PPF by two Liebour supporters who, it turns out, weren’t aware that their money was going to be diverted to Hain’s campaign.  The background notes with Hain’s statement claiming it was all an “innocent mistake” said “When unpaid bills came to light PPF was approached and with the permission of the individual donors concerned the monies were donated to Hain4Labour”.  These would be the individual donors who say they didn’t know the money was being diverted to Hain’s campaign.

Just how much sleaze, fraud and rampant corruption can Liebour expect us to accept?  Have they been taking lessons from the Italians?  This party really has to be closed down – they’re riddled with fraud and corruption from the top down.  Hain’s resignation should have been on No Mandate Brown’s desk as soon as it became public that he had broken the law and lied to the electorate about the donations made through the PPF without permission of the donors.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

What’s behind the promotion of Britishness?

The Torygraph, the BBC, Walkers, Stagecoach – just four companies (yes, the BBC is a company even if it does appear to be more like a government department or a branch of the Liebour Party) that are spending their own money actively promoting “Britain” and Britishness.

Why?  What would prompt Walkers – a multinational corporation – to spend £27m on a Britishness campaign?  Why would Stagecoach spend god knows how many millions on an advertising campaign saying how wonderful “Britain” is?  The Torygraph may be the mouthpiece of the Conswervatives but why devote so much time and money to promoting Britishness, especially when the Torgraph has a Scottish edition?  And the BBC – yes, it’s the British Broadcasting Corporation but they’re short of cash, cutting back on staff and programming yet they still feel it neccessary to spend money on promoting Britishness.

There is something behind this and I don’t know who it is.  It’s got to be either Liebour, the Conswervatives or Common Purpose – I can’t think who else would have the money and influence to get a multi-national corporation to spend £27m on promoting a political agenda that will probably damage their sales.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Nuclear Family

No Mandate Brown will announce today that the British government intends to build nuclear power stations in England.

He won’t be making the same announcement about Scotland, of course, because it’s a devolved matter and the Scottish Parliament has decided that Gordon Brown’s constituents and their fellow countrymen won’t be getting nuclear power stations.

Now, I agree with building nuclear power plants.  They produce very little pollution during their operation if you discount the radioactive waste that is left over once they’re decommissioned.  Nuclear plants have an excellent safety record, they don’t rely on fossil fuels and the electricity they produce is reliable and relatively cheap.  And I’m not a NIMBY either, there has been talk of replacing the Ironbridge B coal-fired power station with a nuclear plant and that’s close enough to my house for me to be able to see the plume of smoke it produces round the clock.

However, like I said the other day when the Goblin King announced that health screening was to be increased in England, I don’t care whether what he is announcing is a good thing, he has no mandate to do it.

Socialist Unity points out that this isn’t a devolved issue in Wales so it would be possible for the British government to build nuclear plants there.  But they won’t build them in Wales because the Welsh government doesn’t want it and the last thing Liebour wants is to lose more support in Wales where they have already been forced to form a coalition government with the nationalist Plaid Cymru.  Going against the wishes of the Welsh government on such an important issue will seriously damage Liebour and put them in the nightmare position of losing control of both Wales and Scotland, the source of their Westminster majority.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Which is worse?

The West Midlands Conservative MEP group – headed by eurofederalist MEP, Philip Bradbourn – has a picture of Birmingham, ALABAMA on its website rather than Birmingham, England.

Tom Watson, the Liebour MP for West Bromwich makes political capital out of it on his blog and ends up in all the papers today being credited with the discovery.

Unfortunately for Tom, the blog where he nicked the story from belongs to one of his constituents.

So which is worse?  The MEPs putting a picture of the wrong city on their website or an MP reading a story on a constituents blog, writing about it on their own blog and taking the credit for the story?

New Liebour, New Technology, New Sleaze.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

Government to ban prison officers from striking …

but only in England and Wales.

The Scottish Executive have ruled out a ban on Scottish prison officers going on strike saying that they have an agreement for binding arbitration in the event of a dispute with prison officers.

Jack Straw intends to ban prison officers in England and Wales from striking if a voluntary arbitration agreement can’t be reached.  The Commons debate on removing prison officers’ rights totalled only 58 minutes.

The amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill has been criticised by a Liebour MP who says that it could be used to ban strikes by other public sector workers.

The Tories introduced the ban on prison officers in 1994, opposed by Liebour who said that they would repeal the ban when they got elected.  They eventually did it in 2005 – six years after getting into power – and less than 3 years later are reintroducing it.

Why did both sides agree to binding arbitration in Scotland both only voluntary in England?  Simple – the British government can’t be trusted by the English.  Binding arbitration was ignored to cut English nurses pay rises in early 2007 and again in late 2007 with English police.  The Scottish government, meanwhile, has honoured its obligations on both nurses and police pay and awarded them the pay deal that the arbitration panel ruled.  If the British government ignores binding arbitration then what hope is there for police officers with only a voluntary agreement?

Yet another example of anti-English discrimination by the Brit-Scot Liebour government.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

A week ago, No Mandate Brown said that all the sleaze, corruption and gneral criminality of Liebour would all be forgotten soon.

Unfortunately for the One Eyed Wonder of Wankistan, the Metropolitan Police are apparently proposing to press criminal charges against Peter Watt.

Peter Watt was the General Secretary of the Liebour Party and was responsible for vetting donations and the person held legally responsible if the donations turn out to be fraudulent.

Oh dear, it’s not been forgotten yet Gordon.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

A nation of Goldfish?

No Mandate Brown thinks that the English are a nation of goldfish who will forget the recent scandals – fraud, sleaze, incompetence, treason – that have marked his first few months in power.

He actually had the gall to say “I think people know that when a problem arises we will deal with it” – it’s his Liebour Party that is the cause of all the recent problems.  His party took illegal donations, his party is drowning in sleaze, his party full of incompetent failures, his party has committed treason.  The best way to deal with these problems is to nip them in the bud before they happen by resigning and calling an election.

The Goblin King says that he doesn’t want recent events to divert them from their long-term aims on housing, health and education.  None of which he has a mandate for because they’re all devolved in Scotland where he was elected.

Well, I’m sorry to disappoint you Gordo but I’ll make sure that every one of your failures, every criminal act, every act of treason, is remembered for as long as you manage to cling desperately onto the position that you have been given by your corrupt party.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

No Excuse

Liebour was given £183,000 by the Electoral Commission in 2001-02 to help them train staff to understand funding rules under the new Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.

Despite having full training at considerable expense to the taxpayer, Liebour has continued to accept various illegal donations.

So, not only did they break the law by accepting donations that they knew were illegal but they did so after the party had received training at the taxpayers expense.  This is fraud of the worst kind – the trust they have been given by the electorate to govern this country in an honest and acceptable manner has been abused.  The Electoral Commission shouldn’t stop at reclaiming illegal donations, they should strike them off the register of political parties and seek a winding-up order against the Liebour Party.  They simply can’t be trusted.  Any company that showed such persistent contempt for the law would have been prosecuted and wound up by now.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Scottish Liebour wants devolution review

Wendy Alexander, the disgraced Scottish Liebour leader who took an illegal donation for a Jersey businessman, has gained the support of the Scottish Conswervatives and Scottish Illiberal Dumbasscrats for a devolution review funded by the Scottish Parliament.

Alexander will be calling for a review today into devolution in general and how the Scottish Parliament’s financial accountability can be strengthened.

It’s not clear whether this is the usual Liebour tactic of getting caught doing something wrong and passing more laws to stop it happening rather than keeping their own house in order, or whether it is a genuine desire to improve the way the Scottish Parliament works and make sure that all those lovely billions they get in subsidies from the English taxpayer are spent properly and not spent on Iron Bru, whiskey and battered mars bars.

On a related note, the illegal donations that Liebour received and No Mandate Brown promised to refund will most likely end up being confiscated and paid into the Treasury instead.  I guess that even Gordon the Goblin King couldn’t get away with forcing UKIP to forfeit the unlawful donation they mistakenly accepted whilst refunding what they knew was an illegal donation to the donor.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , , ,

More Liebour illegal donations

Wendy Alexander MSP has admitted receiving an illegal donation.  Her Scottish Liebour colleague, Charlie Gordon MSP, who asked for the donation has resigned as Liebour transport spokesman at the Scottish Parliament.

A property developer in Jersey – Paul Green – made a £950 donation to her leadership campaign through a property company in which he has a controlling share.  However, his signature was on the cheque and as a non-UK resident the donation was illegal.

This is the latest in a string of donation-related sleaze that has beset the Liebour Party.  Earlier this week No Mandate Brown pledged to repay over £600,000 that had been illegally donated to the Liebour Party and Harriet Harman admitted to receiving illegal donations from the same man during her deputy leadership campaign.  Going further back there is the whole Cash for Peerages scandal which, somehow, the Liebour Party managed to get away with.

Whilst it is good that the Liebour Party is being exposed for the corrupt, sleaze-ridden bag of shit that it is, there is a down side.  This is all being used as justification by Liebour – which is £29.2m in debt – for state funding of political parties.  The last set of tightened rules around financing political parties was, of course, to try and stop Liebour from selling peerages.  Shouldn’t alarm bells be ringing at the Electoral Commission by now?

Political parties need to learn to live within their means.  State funding of parties is an appalling suggestion – if they do a good job, they will get enough support to keep themselves in the black.  If they find that they have such a low level of support that they have to borrow £29.2m to pay bills and fight elections then they clearly aren’t the popular party they claim to be.  How will state funding make sure parties get the right amount of money?  Based on votes polled at the last election?  This is used by the BBC to ensure that small political parties are kept off the TV during elections and votes don’t necessarily equal support.  People will vote for one party that they don’t want to get rid of another party they don’t want.  What they won’t do is donate money to a party they don’t want and that is a good indication of how much support a party has.  In short, the current system is perfectly fair and will continue to be the best way for parties to get money as long as the Electoral Commission and the Police make sure that parties that knowingly break rules on party financing are severely punished.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

What happens if Liebour goes under?

The One Eyed Wonder of Wankistan yesterday pledged to repay the £664,000 in illegal donations that his party knowingly took from David Abrahams.

The Labour Party has outstanding debts of £29,178,692 – nearly £29.2m.  Does Labour have sufficient liquidity to meet loan repayments?  No, it has had to restructure some of its loans.  Does it have sufficient assets – property, cash reserves, guarantors – to repay its debts?  No, it has very few assets.  The Liebour Party is insolvent.

Jon Mendelsohn, Liebour’s chief fundraiser, apparently knew that the donations were illegal and that Abraham’s dodgy donations weren’t a one-off.  Mendelsohn is in charge of finding cash for elections and is No Mandate Brown’s personal fundraiser.

The donations were illegal because the money came from Mr Abrahams but were donated through third party’s without disclosing their origin to the Electoral Commission.  But it doesn’t stop there.  One of the third party’s, Janet Dunn, says that she knows nothing about the donations made in her name and is actually a Conservative supporter.

But there’s more.  During the deputy leader’s “election” campaign, Abraham offered donations to Hillary Benn and Harriet Harman via a third party.  Hillary Benn refused the money until it was donated in Abraham’s name but Harman accepted the donaton.  Harriet Harman is married to Jack Dromey, the Treasurer of the Liebour Party.

This kind of scandal would bring most government’s down.  It is a testament to the patience (or should that be intolerable stupidity and disinterest) of the English that the Liebour Party still exists, let alone remains in power.  Lies, fraud and corruption are rife in the Labour Party and the British establishment as a whole.

What happens if a large creditor – the Unity Trust Bank for example – decides to call in its loans?  Liebour hasn’t exactly been union friendly this time round and they shouldn’t rely on union support forever – it’ll carry on for as long as they are useful to each other and no longer (Unity Trust Bank is a union bank).  If the Liebour Party no longer exists can a Liebour government continue to run the country?

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

How long before Liebour is brought down?

In most civillised countries a government that is caught breaking laws and abusing the public trust every couple of months would have collapsed and senior ministers and party officials would be enjoying some hospitality at Her Majesty’s pleasure.  So what’s it going to take to bring down this corrupt Liebour government?

The public were lied to about the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.  We were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that they were capable of launching an attack on the UK within 45 minutes.  We were lied to about the cash for honours case.  We were told that Liebour hadn’t offered peerages in return for donations to their party when they had.  We were lied to about the ban on fox hunting.  We were told that it was to save the poor little vermin when it was simply part of Liebour’s jealous class war and kowtowing to animal rights terrorists.  We are being lied to about the terrorist threat and the need to curtail our rights and liberties.  Anti-terror legislation has been used to stop and search over 100,000 people and none of them turned out to be terrorists and ID cards are being introduced at huge cost and against the will of the electorate that are so secure that famous people and members of the government won’t have their details on it for security reasons.  We are being lied to about the threat from global warming.  We are told that unless we all turn to subsistence farming and live in mud huts we will be burned alive on the parched earth and drown from rising sea levels but the reality is that climate change is a natural phenomenen and the scientific world is divided into three parts – those who don’t think it’s anything to worry about, those who do and (the biggest part) those who are being paid stupid amounts of money to say that it is.

There are so many lies and examples of corruption I don’t have the time or inclination to write them down.  But there is another one to add to the list today.

Peter Watt, the General Secretary of the Liebour Party, has resigned after admitting that he knew that a property developer made £600,000 of donations to the Liebour Party via three associates without the Electoral Commission being informed.  This is a serious offence – not only is it illegal but it is an abuse of the trust that the electorate is supposed to have in the government.

But you reap what you sow as the saying goes and Liebour are suffering for their corruption and dictatorial ways.  The latest opinion poll shows that Liebour has only 27% support witht he Tories on 40%.  The increasing charge sheet against the Liebour Party, the rapidly dwindling support for the Liebour government and the crippling debts they’ve run up trying cling desperately onto power could prove to be the death of the party.  No wonder they’re still trying to introduce state funding of parties.

Will Liebour see out the year?  Probably.  will they last until the next general election?  Probably.  Heads will undoubtedly roll but the party will stay in power for as long as it can get away with it and there’s little chance of forcing them out of power by taking to the streets because then you’ll be branded a terrorist and riot police will take you away.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

Another one bites the dust

A by-election in the Brookside ward of Telford & Wrekin Council yesterday saw Liebour lose yet another seat on the borough.

Earlier this year the Conswervatives took control of Telford & Wrekin Council from Liebour who had held the unitary authority since it was created.  On balance the change from red to blue has been a good one – a few broken promises but more good than bad.

My candidate of choice (an independent who runs Telford Council Watch) didn’t win, unfortunately, but I would rather a Conswervative won than another Liebour candidate.

The run-up to the election wasn’t entirely without event.  The independent candidate was first out with his posters which he replaced 3 times before giving up.  His posters were torn down and Liebour posters appeared in their place.  The police reluctantly got involved, asked the local Liebour MP, David Wright, and the prospective Liebour councillor if they knew anything about it and they said yes, they’d been told who’d done it.  Unfortunately, the police weren’t really interested in finding out who did it which is a shame because trying to unduly affect the outcome of an election is a criminal offence.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,